Two task force teams on civil service reform austerity and restructuring recommended that the NAB should not proceed against civil or retired officials without the approval of federal and local supervisory boards. The decision to communicate these recommendations to the federal government was made last month at a meeting in Islamabad. Dr. Ishrat Hussain, PM's advisor on institutional reform and tightening, was in the chairman.
According to the recently released minutes
A copy of the copy could be provided with us, so that attorney Salman Akram Raja submitted an amendment to the NAB law in light of the decision made at the previous Task Force meeting. No investigation or referral has been initiated or an arrest of a person has been proposed unless the NAB has submitted a priority committee to the supervisory committee to proceed with the referral, investigation or arrest. Therefore, the supervisory board will assist the bureau to filter the investigation process by determining whether there is sufficient initial evidence to proceed with the investigation or arrest by the NAB.
Determining whether there is sufficient evidence of the suspect by a federal or state supervisory agency recommended. Persons in litigation include people who have worked or worked in the state, including contract or former appointments. For the sake of clarity, the definition of “person” has been embodied. It was agreed that this definition would only cover civil servants, not politicians with public servants.
The Board of Supervisors is a judge with a high court, three persons who served as secretaries of the federal government, or had an equivalent position and retired at least two years before being appointed to the Board of Supervisors, senior certified accountant, senior banker and senior civil engineer, domain expert You can choose. Salman Akram Raja proposed that a council of 15 members elect a member of the supervisory committee by a majority vote.
Parliamentarians are nominated as National Assembly Chairs with at least 10 members. Task Force members suggested that in order for the Parliamentary Committee to conduct due diligence, it was necessary to have a larger pool of candidates, and at least three names for each member category of the supervisory committee should be presented to the Parliamentary Committee.
Panel proposed of the government
The parliamentary committee also rejected the panel proposed by the government and suggested that a new name could be proposed or found. Participants agreed that before the supervisory committee had balanced and transferred references to government servants, there had to be adequate protection and that they had to come up with ways to strengthen and provide internal responsibility. Assistance to NAB in case of crime. The meeting suggested that there should be at least one supervisory board in the federal as well as at the local level, including Gilgit-Baltistan.
It must be approved by the supervisory committee before the NAB can proceed with the referral, investigation or arrest of the government bell. The government will provide a panel of three names for each member category of the supervisory committee, allowing the council committee to select one member from each category. The establishment department will provide secretary support to the parliamentary committee.
The National Assembly Committee shall be authorized to elect members of the Supervisory Commission or to propose or find new names in the committees provided. The members of the supervisory committee shall serve for a single period of four years. The terms of service for members of the supervisory board must be the same as those for the members of the Federal Public Service Commission from time to time.
Task Force participants who requested anonymity said the proposal would be sent to the government for approval. He said that if the proposal were implemented, it would be the answer to complaints from public officials all over the country, alleging intimidation and humiliation at the hands of NAB.
Supreme Court ruled on 20 August
The Supreme Court gave a video clip that would benefit former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif only if the responsible court judge Mohammad Arshad Malik was properly produced before the Islamabad High Court (IHC) as an appeal for his conviction. Opened. At a press conference in Lahore, the video clip, aired by Maryam Nawaz, will be evidence only if its authenticity is proved by law, saying the Supreme Court of Asif Saeed Khosa had a 25-page verdict and announced publicly.
Court on Friday. The Tribunal Supreme Court finally ruled in disposing a series of identical petitions in the video scanning case, all requiring an investigative or judicial commission to investigate the matter. The IHC decides whether the judge's actions resulted in prejudice. Apex Court handles video scandal petition.
The bottom line is a quote from the Asif Ali Zardari case in 2001, some audio tapes and copies of which were produced as an appeal to the conviction and sentence of the SGS Pre-Shipment Inspection Committee. The purpose of the audiotape was to establish the prejudice of the Lahore High Court judge who dismissed the prisoner's appeal.
Since audio tapes and their copies have never been duly proven by law, the Apex court did not rely on the courts to bring tapes to appeal records or render such materials. Final judgment. The ruling mentions Malik's act, with the July 7 press release and the July 11 statement stating that the approved acts emanating from these two documents had a stink, and that the odor of those malicious acts brought bad names to the entire judiciary.
The judge of course
I regretted the charges because they were prone. CJP Khosa was unpleasant as an educational institution. The judge, of course, admitted to his shady past and admitted that he had a skeleton in cupboards vulnerable to intimidation. Moreover, the judge held a private meeting with those who had sympathy for being tried by the accused, and was threatened and offered to him during the trial, but the case was reported to a superior authority or tried.
The SC ruling convicted the judge in conviction in the latter's residence in another city, and after meeting his son in another country, finally pointed out the weakness and directed some evidence to help convict his judgment. If the. These judges' actions were not only disgusting, offensive and shocking to the judge's image in society," the verdict found. Bench made his thousands of honest, straightforward, fair and appropriate judges ashamed of his head with his delightful and disgusting behavior. The judgment consists of five questions and answered all the questions.
There was a question about a related forum to consider in the Nawaz Sharif case. Set the video as true evidence; How to prove video evidence in court; Impact on the Nawaz case; And the actions of the responsible court judge. The SC ruling explained that if the evidence turned out to be valid for the effect of the video, the IHC should decide whether or not the act of Judge Malik, who was portrayed through the video and found to be offensive, was the cause of some prejudice.
If the IHC has come to the conclusion that the proceedings and recorded evidence have not been affected by the judge's actions, the IHC will have the option to reevaluate the evidence itself and determine the appeal based on the following grounds: Based on the evidence already recorded, it is necessary to listen to the claims of the parties and then repatriate them to the available evidence or to the trial court to reconsider the case.
According to the SC ruling
If the IHC feels the need to take video as additional evidence in its own consent or in the Nawaz application, it may record the reason for that need and follow the steps mentioned in section 428 of the Criminal Procedure Act. SC described the truth of video clips as scientific and technological advances have made it very convenient to edit, doctor, superimpose, or photo-edit audio or photos on audio tapes or videos.
Thus, without forensic examination, audit or testing of audiotape or video, it became increasingly unsafe to rely on evidence in court. Because realistic doubts about audio or videotape, rather than verdicts, can destroy credibility and credibility, the standards of evidence required in criminal judgments are unreasonable.